JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 23, 2025

A- de 2025

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimir Fernández Andrade

✓Claimant Héctor Alfonso Carvajal Londoño·Respondent --

✓
Topic · hard data
Sin Información
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento De Los Magistrados De La Corte Constitucional
  • Declarar fundado el impedimento por haber sido apoderado, contraparte o asesor de alguna de las partes
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Impedimento formulado por el magistrado Héctor Alfonso Carvajal Londoño.

El precitado funcionario invocó la causal prevista en el numeral 4 del artículo 56 de la Ley 906 de 2004, en tanto actuó como apoderado defensor de uno de los accionantes.

Concluyó la Sala que el servicio profesional prestado por el doctor Carvajal configuró la causal invocada, esto es, actuar previamente como apoderado, defensor o contraparte de un proceso judicial en el que participó algunas de las partes del caso actual.

Con base en lo anterior, se declaró FUNDADO el impedimento y se decidió separarlo del conocimiento del proceso de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR FUNDADO el impedimento declarado por el magistrado Héctor Alfonso Carvajal Londoño para participar en la decisión del expediente T-10.860.013 y, por ende, se decide SEPARARLO del conocimiento del mencionado proceso.
  2. Cópiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.